DEMOCRATS MUST KEEP THE HISPANICS DEPENDENT
Do border walls work? Why didn’t President Obama push amnesty to DREAMERS? Should a Veteran immigrant be deported? Did President Obama’s inability to govern and his desire to be dictator and chief create the DACA problem we have today? If Trump fixes the immigration policy in the United States and creates a path to citizenship for DREAMERS is that good for America? What did our founding Fathers say about immigrants? Why do your liberal progressive friends post things on social media which have pre-ordained conundrums? Do illegal immigrants really kill many Americans? Are they immigrants or migrant workers? If illegal immigration is declining should we ignore US immigration policy and leave it as it is?
IMMIGRANTS KILL MORE AMERICANS THAN TERRORISTS KILLED ON 911: Terrorists killed 2,996 people on 9/11. According to the GAO & FBI criminal illegal aliens commit murder at a higher rate than American citizens. The statistics are from 2005 – 2008 115,717 murders in the U.S. with criminal aliens committing 25,064 or 21% of all murders while being about 5.7% of the US population. Don Rosenberg’s son Drew was killed by an illegal alien. Don has been a lifelong California Democrat but now is fighting sanctuary cities and favors what Trump is proposing regarding immigration reform and the wall. Rosenberg started to track how many Americans are killed each year by illegal immigrants. He started a website Unlicensed to kill in order to track the numbers. According to that site more Americans are killed each year by illegal immigrant drivers than American citizens. Drew was killed November 16, 2010 and he was one of more than 3,000 Americans killed by illegal immigrant drivers in America that year. According to the site, 20 Americans are killed each day snuffing out their dreams and the dreams of their families.
ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS DECREASING: Liberal progressives do not like using the word illegal and will use words like unauthorized, which is a politically correct way of saying illegal. Statistics state illegal immigration is decreasing and in 2015 was the lowest since 2009, but according to PEW Research there are still over 11 million illegal immigrants in the US. Decreasing immigration or not there is still 11 million illegals. Reagan gave amnesty with a promise for wall funding which never came. Liberals sob over these illegals but want Trump and the rest of us to ignore the problem. The Wall, ending chain migration and ending the visa lottery will solve the illegal problem for future generations. Democrats do not want the problem fixed because they must have a dependent class.
PRESIDENT BUSH: Bush the second wanted to fix the United States broken immigration system and address the DREAMER or DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) issue. After months of negotiations, Harry Reid and the Democratic controlled Senate, was not able to pass the legislation sought by President Bush. If the law had passed Bush would have signed it, and the law would have resulted in 12 million illegal immigrants being granted temporary worker permits, created a merit-based system for future immigrants, and beefed up border security. The vote did not even get a simple majority with 33 Democrats, 12 Republicans and one Independent voting in favor but 15 Democrats and 37 Republicans and the other independent voted to block the legislation, 53 to 46.
MIGRANTS OR IMMIGRANTS: Mexican President Calderon was sad that this bill did not pass and he stated, “The U.S. economy cannot keep going without migrant labor,”! To the media, liberals, progressive Democrats and RHINO Republicans these migrants are immigrants. Check out my website for my post, ARE THEY IMMIGRANTS OR MIGRANTS.
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Democrats, liberals and progressives need to always have a class of people that are dependent on their good will. Why do I make that statement? In 2009 when Obama became President he had 58 D & 2 Independents in the US Senate led by Harry Reid, and in the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi was the leader with 255 members. The legislation was brought up in 2009 and voted on late in 2010 but was defeated by 5 votes. If the Democrats truly wanted to solve this and make all of the DACA children legal residents, they would have and could have during Obama’s first two years. Remember the Democrats instituted the nuclear option November 2013, and if they truly wanted amnesty for the Dreamers how come they did not implement the nuclear option to pass this legislation in 2010. Democrats need a dependent class and they arrogantly believe that the Blacks will always vote for them so now they need to create a new class of dependent people, the Hispanic Migrant workers.
PRESIDENT OBAMA WAS WEAK: Did Obama know how to negotiate? He learned his skills as a community organizer. Obama knew intimidation tactics to get compliance or to extort money with a promise to remove the protesters that he sent in the first place. These learned tactics are not as successful with the US Congress and American people. (OPINION – PHILOSOPHICALLY DEMOCRATS, LIBERALS & PROGRESSIVES ARE CLOSELY ALIGNED WITH SOCIALISTS AND FASCISTS LEADERS AND THE ECONOMIC LEADERSHIP PRINCIPLES THEY ESPOUSE). Why do I make that observation? Obama proclaimed his intentions to use executive action by saying, “I’ve got a pen and I’ve got a phone”. On 25 separate occasions Obama stated that he could not do anything legally without congress. Obama signed the DREAM ACT on June 2012. He did this because he assumed that any President to follow him would be as ineffective as he had been or support what he had done. Obama also assumed that no leader would have the intestinal fortitude and backbone to address DACA, Obama never thought of Trump.
TRUMPS 2018 STATE OF THE UNION: During the state of the union Trump outlined 4 pillars for immigration reform. 1 – A path to citizenship for 1.8 million DREAMERS. 2– End to chain migration. 3 – End of the Visa lottery system replacing both of those with a merit based system. 4 – 25 billion in a trust fund to build the wall. Unlike Reagan who granted amnesty in 1986 with a promise to fund and build the border wall, Trump is demanding a Trust fund so that the money cannot be stolen and spent someplace else later.
DEMOCRATS SAY NO TO DREAMERS: Senator Schumer and Democrats have always referenced 800,000 DACA or DREAMERS whose situation Democrats say must be fixed with amnesty. But now they say no to President Trump’s offer to grant a path to citizenship. Could it be that the offer to allow a path to citizenship for 1.8 million is too many people? Or could it be that the Democrats really do not want to solve the issues for DACA or DREAMERS? I think Democrats do not want this solved because it takes away the dependent Hispanics class Democrats need.
TOTAL IMMIGRATION REFORM: Immigration has been an issue for decades. Under chain migration, about 70% of legal immigrants admitted to the United States each year do so based on family ties rather than merit. The Visa Lottery immigration system is no better. The lottery selects up to 50,000 foreigners to apply for permanent residence (GREEN CARDS). Many have no ties to the U.S. and no special skills plus a poor education. Not all of these immigrants are terrorists but without a better vetting process who knows and not knowing is a concern. Trump wants the immigration system to be more of a merit based system similar to what most other developed countries have as an immigration system and similar to what America had at Ellis Island..
SCREENING IMMIGRANTS IS NOT NEW: Nearly 40% of all current U.S. Citizens can trace at least one of their ancestors to Ellis Island. Ellis Island opened in 1892 to function as an immigration station and closed in 1954. Trump talks of a merit based system and that is nothing new. Immigrants coming to Ellis Island were screened and separated if they were deemed mentally ill, having a contagious disease, anarchists, those with a physical disability, children without parents, also a literacy test was given requiring 30 to 40 words a minute in your native language to anyone over the age of 16. Quotas were established specifying how many immigrants can enter the US each year. President Johnson lifted the quotas and ushered in the broken modern age of immigration.
EVERYONE LOVES THE WALL: On social media there is a post = Decades ago we cheered when our president convinced Gorbachev to “Tear down this wall”, now we want to build one of our own. This is a cute and innocent statement but not a good comparison of two very different walls. The Berlin Wall was meant to keep people from escaping from communism to the free or capitalist side; many tried and were killed in the attempt. The wall Trump proposes will simply be creating designated locations to enter the U.S. safely and legally. The wall on America’s southern border is meant to reduce drug trafficking, human smuggling and illegal immigration.
SOUTHERN WALL WILL REPEL MILITARY INVASION: I saw another post on social media where a person stated that the Great Wall of China and the French Maginot Line failed therefore Trumps Wall will fail. These are just pitiful, weak and snarky arguments by liberal progressives on social media. I refer to these liberal progressive posts on social media as pre-ordained conundrums. Immigrants to America are not invaders.
WORLD OF WALLS: There are over 65 border walls today and there were 16 when the Berlin Wall came down. Globalists around the world as well as our media, Democrats, Liberals and Progressives want no borders which is why they hate Trump. Ironically much of the new wall building around the world has been fueled by the refugees from the Middle East as a result of the war with ISIS.
Greece’s border fence was one of the first, and Greece’s Dimitris Avramopoulos, a career Greek Diplomat still defends it. He says Greece built it to divert people towards official crossings where they could apply for asylum. Greece’s fence had a knock-out effect that continues to ripple through Europe as more countries wall themselves off. Saudi Arabia is building a 600 mile wall from Jordan to Kuwait to keep out unwanted. A wall is not perfect and no one believes it is 100% secure, but the better the wall the closer to 100% you get. The West Bank wall in Israel is pretty effective because as the wall is being constructed the suicide bombers coming from Palestine to kill Israelis have dwindled from the 1,000’s to zero in most portions of the wall. Of course besides the cement wall there will be detection equipment for tunnels and surface surveillance equipment etc. To continue to be a sovereign nation that country has the right to control who enters their country.
AMERICA HATES IMMIGRANTS: Everyone knows that America is a nation of immigrants and immigrants have contributed greatly to our country. Certainly the screening at Ellis Island contributed to the high level contributions to our country by immigrants to some degree, because the US was selective in whom they allowed in. Most 21st century countries are selective in who they allow in as a worker and who they allow to immigrate and who they allow to apply for citizenship. America loves immigrants to include the Native Americans that came here in 3 waves of migration some as long as 15,000 years ago. DNA studies of 52 Native American Tribes and 17 Siberian tribes comprise most people from Canada to the Northern portion of Chili. So it is safe to say that most people living in the United States immigrated or migrated to get here.
LIBERAL PROGRESSIVES USE CUTE EXAMPLES: Liberal progressives on social media love to use pre-ordained conundrums which they hope will stump their conservative friends. For example: the Great Wall of China and the Maginot Line failed, therefore the wall between America and Mexico will not work. Another example is Reagan told Gorbachev to tear down a wall, and we cheered and now we are to build another. Perhaps not the best examples but you get the gist.
LIBERALS LOVE IMMIGRANT SOB STORIES: So let’s look at the latest liberal SOB story on social media the tear jerker deportation of an army veteran DREAMER. One way for DREAMERS to become a U.S. citizen is to serve in the military but as an applicant you must demonstrate good moral character. The liberal progressives will be posting various photos of Veterans who served and may now be deported. A liberal progressive friend of mine tossed Miguel Perez Jr. at me wondering how I felt about a fellow veteran being deported. Perez was born in Mexico and came to America with his family when he was 8 years old. He became a permanent resident in 1989 and could have applied for citizenship in 1994. His parents and siblings are Naturalized citizens. Immigration Services has policies to expedite veteran’s naturalization but a primary requirement is the applicant must demonstrate (GOOD MORAL CHARACTER). Besides expeditiously processing a veteran, if ICE wants to remove any veterans there are extra steps to include review and authorization by senior ICE leadership. Perez left military service in 2004 with a general discharge due to drug charges. Perez was convicted in 1998 for a small drug charge so the 2004 discharge was not his first which means that the military gave him a second chance when he enlisted. Perez was allowed to remain in the United States and did not get his green card taken away until he was convicted of delivering more than 2 pounds of cocaine to an undercover officer. Perez said he was surprised to be sent to an ICE detention facility because he thought he was a citizen. I am a veteran and I say that statement is BS because when he enlisted he had to prove his citizenship, so if he did not know before he enlisted he certainly knew and was made aware during the enlistment process.
WHAT DID PRESIDENT OBAMA SAY ABOUT IMMIGRANTS: America’s most recent liberal progressive President Obama said, “Restricting immigration in order to protect national security is – offensive and contrary to American values.” Holy cow read that Obama statement a few times & let it sink in. I love it when Liberals tell us how to think & what our values are as a nation. This is another excellent example of a pre-ordained conundrum or liberal speak designed to lead you into a corner so that you must agree, or be labeled as hateful, bigoted, prejudice etc.
WHAT DID OUR FOUNDING FATHERS SAY ABOUT IMMIGRANTS: Our founding Fathers were clear in their view of immigrants, it was not to get new voters or a ruling underclass majority but the purpose of immigration was to preserve, protect and enhance the republic the Founding Fathers put their lives on the line to establish. COMPARE THIS TO OBAMA’S STATEMENT) The concept of the “nation of immigrants” is not for diversity, not because big business wants cheap labor and not simply to swell the population, but to increase the wealth and strength of the community. Madison argued plainly that America should only welcome the immigrant who could assimilate, but exclude the immigrant who could not readily, incorporate himself into our society. Washington emphasized that immigrants should be absorbed into American life, by an inter-mixture of our people, they, or their descendants, get assimilated to our customs, measures, laws; in a word soon become one people. Hamilton maintained that the safety and survival of the American Republic depends upon, the preservation of a national spirit, common national sentiment, uniformity of principles, habits, national character are dependent on the integration of immigrants. Note that a key point made by our founding fathers is integration and assimilation not separation. Separation or class warfare is critical to the liberal, progressive Democrat agenda in order to maintain a dependent class.
I WILL CLOSE WITH HAMILTON: Hamilton stated, “To admit foreigners indiscriminately to the rights of citizens the moment they put foot in our country would be nothing less than to admit the Grecian horse into the citadel of our liberty and sovereignty”. Read this Hamilton statement a few times to let that sink in.